Connect with Us

Empowering You. Creating Choices. Successful Outcomes.

Insights

Jams 2 Pty Ltd v Stubbings

Lenders, Borrowers and their Advisers, take note!

In the matter of Jams 2 Pty Ltd v Stubbings, the Victorian Supreme Court of Appeal clarified key principles of unconscionability. The Lenders were found by the trial judge to have acted in an unconscionable manner in arranging an asset-based loan. The loan relied only on property as security. It failed to assess the Borrower’s limited ability to repay the loan. However, this finding was overturned by the Victorian Supreme Court of Appeal.

Case Background

The Lenders gave a first loan of $1,059,000 and a second loan of $133,500 to a company owned by Stubbings, Victorian Boat Clinic Pty Ltd, the Borrower. The loans were to help Stubbings in the funding of the purchase of a residential property in Fingal (‘Property’). The first loan had an interest rate of 10% per annum and a default rate of 17% per annum. The second loan had an interest rate of 18% per annum and a default interest rate of 25%. The loans were secured by a guarantee given by Stubbings along with mortgages over the Property and two other properties owned by the Borrower.

The Borrower had minimal income and had no assets other than the properties which were mortgaged. The Borrower had insufficient funds to pay the deposit of 10% towards purchase the Property.

In September 2015, the loans were advanced, and the Property purchase settled. The Borrower moved into the Property and paid the first two monthly interest instalments to the Lenders by selling valuables that he owned, before defaulting on the instalments. Demands for payment were issued by the Lenders before the Lenders commenced legal proceedings for recovery of the guaranteed debt. The Lenders took possession of the two properties of the Borrower which had been provided as security.

Trial Proceedings

The Trial Judge upheld the Borrower’s claim stating that the loan, mortgage and guarantee were procured by unconscionable conduct and ordered that they be set aside. The Judge stated that the Lender’s lawyers (AJ Lawyers) in providing legal and accounting advice were aware of the Borrower’s personal and financial circumstances and willingly chose to turn a blind eye to them. The Judge found the Borrower’s position to be one of special disadvantage when giving the guarantee and the mortgages and that AJ Lawyers’ behaviour constituted unconscionable conduct which also bound their clients, the Lenders.

The Borrower joined the following as third parties to the litigation:

  • Mr Zourkas, the consultant who organised the loan;
  • Mr Topalides, the accountant who signed the certificate of independent financial advice; and
  • Mr Kiatos, the solicitor who signed the solicitor’s certificate.

Court of Appeal Proceedings

The Court of Appeal upheld the Lenders’ argument that making asset-based loans available on a ‘take it or leave it’ basis was not unconscionable in this case. The Court stated that asset-based lending will not automatically be deemed unconscionable but will simply be a ‘relevant factor in deciding whether a particular loan resulted from unconscionable conduct’ in all the circumstances of the case.

What does this mean for Lenders, Borrowers and their Advisers?

The Court of Appeal has clarified the test for statutory unconscionability. Lenders have been provided with a level of certainty regarding their ability to provide asset-based lending and to rely on solicitors’ and accountants’ certificates in some circumstances. The case also warns borrowers, guarantors and their advisors that the law will not always be available to protect them from a bad bargain.

Need legal advice and assistance?

Please feel free to reach out to Elizabeth Ong (Special Counsel) on +61 3 9822 8588 or eong@burkelawyers.com.au. Burke & Associates Lawyers are here support you in your commercial, banking and finance needs. We look forward to hearing from you.

Insight written by Elizabeth Ong

 

Contacts

Meghan Warren

Principal

Meghan Warren

Principal
LL.B GAICD B.Bus (FinPlan)
Meghan is one of the few lawyers in Australia admitted in the State (Victoria) and Federal jurisdictions of Australia, and as an Attorney at Law to the New York State Bar in the United States.

Kristy Muhlhan

Principal

Kristy Muhlhan

Principal
LL.B (Hons) GRAD DIP. L.P., GAICD.
Since 2014, she has been an owner and Principal of the firm and has mastered a broad range of essential commercial and business skills which go hand in hand with the work she does for...

Rosy Roberts

Principal

Rosy Roberts

Principal
LL.B (Hons) B.A GAICD
Rosy has extensive experience in Litigation & Alternative Dispute Resolution having represented clients in all Victorian State Courts and the High Court of Australia. She is also a VCAT appointed Administrator.

Anthony Burke

Consultant

Anthony Burke

Consultant
B.A LL.B DIP.FIN. MGT
Tony is an LIV accredited business law specialist and a VCAT appointed Administrator. In 2008 he was President of the Law Institute of Victoria and served for two years as a director of the Law...

Elizabeth Ong

Special Counsel

Elizabeth Ong

Special Counsel
LL.B.(Hons) CLP GDLP
Elizabeth is committed to providing world class, comprehensive commercial solutions and corporate advice tailored to the best interests of her clients. She is fluent in written and verbal English, Mandarin, Cantonese, Hokkien and Malaysian languages.

George Hanger

Associate

George Hanger

Associate
LL.B BA
George was admitted to legal practice in May 2015 after completing a Bachelor of Arts at the University of Melbourne and a Bachelor of Laws at Monash University.

Stewart Davis

Associate

Stewart Davis

Associate
LL.B (Hons) B.Com
As well as property law, Stewart has had exposure to VCAT administration matters and commercial law, particularly servicing developer clients.

Antonela Graso

Paralegal

Antonela Graso

Paralegal
Whilst completing her professional business and law tertiary qualifications, Antonela provides efficient and effective legal support services to our valued teams and clients.

Request Burke & Associates Lawyers' News